Cambridge should reconsider online voting

By  | April 2, 2018 | 5 Comments | Filed under: THE DANGERS OF ELECTRONIC VOTING
Opinion10:11 AM Cambridge Times

I was at Cambridge council March 27 when, later in the session, a very well-spoken professor from Western University, Dr. Aleksander Essex, did a presentation against online voting.

He has a PhD in computer science and is very outspoken against cyber voting. Dr. Essex completed his PhD research on whether cyber voting would ever be safe from hacking. Given all the information, he advised there is no way even in the near or distant future that cyber-secured voting will ever be safe from hacking. I suspect he is the foremost authority in Canada on the subject.

Dr. Essex hit a chord with Mayor Doug Craig and city manager Gary Dyke with a reference to ‘Protect the Brand’, which inferred the city management did not disclose our previous hacking of city computer systems to protect the brand, or in an election year, their brand.

Ken Tuckey

Cambridge

https://www.cambridgetimes.ca/opinion-story/8367630-cambridge-should-reconsider-online-voting/

***********

 

City of Cambridge website hijacked by cryptocurrency miners

 

Facebooktwittergoogle_plus
debbie_vitez@rogers.com'

About 

5 Responses to Cambridge should reconsider online voting

  1. kefran@bell.net'
    RK April 2, 2018 at 5:44 pm

    Well Mayor Craig needs to listen to the professionals and quit his own agenda.
    We need to be assured that we can have faith in the democratic right that we have.
    Love it that it was inferred that the city management did not disclose the hacking of the computer system
    What else does Mayor Craig, Gary Dyke and Michael Du Lillo want to hide.
    I think it’s time that the citizens of Cambridge find out

  2. lvann_11@sympatico.ca'
    Tom Vann April 2, 2018 at 9:19 pm

    I now know of 2 people that will be running in the next election that have a high % of winning. One is 50/50 on running for mayor and the other in a Preston ward. After the provincial election is over I’m certain they both will declare. Everything is on the hush so as to not distract from their candidate. As for city hall watch for a human rights issue to pop up. Did anyone notice the cop car in the lot and another circling the block after the March 27th meeting?

  3. lvann_11@sympatico.ca'
    Tom Vann April 2, 2018 at 10:06 pm

    Nice Ken.
    Not one single normal human could have come out of that meeting feeling good about online voting.

    They can tell who voted for who by your IP number. Doesn’t that scare anyone? Do you still trust this city hall in Cambridge?

    Ever wonder how the mayor and certain council people keep getting elected.

    Ever wonder why Cambridge has a bad reputation in this province?

    Ever wonder why Cambridge sits at or near the top in this province for complaints to the government watch dogs?

    I don’t trust most running this city as far as I can pee.

    Our city has been run into the ground and there is a gravestone coming if changes are not made.

    The bomb is soon to go off this election and all the info gathered, people in place and money waiting to go into informing the dead voters that bitch is exciting.

    We have the plan this year and no more talking. It’s time to DRAIN THE SWAMP!

    Just waiting to hand out all those copies of the police report that tells how city hall sent the cops to my door twice.
    Gotta show the people of Cambridge what we have downtown.

    Guess who gets the blame for it? Happy birthday Doug, Santa says hi.

  4. mjqsmith@bell.net'
    Maggie April 5, 2018 at 7:44 pm

    Well said Ken. Excellent. At least the “Protect the Brand” puts colour into certain people’s cheeks. Probaby helped the BP as well.
    And with all the interest in listening to the Professor there should definitely be a re-consideration re online voting. How many articles to they need to read or hear before they wake up to the fact Internet voting is unreliable.

  5. lvann_11@sympatico.ca'
    R. Muise April 5, 2018 at 9:34 pm

    I mentioned what went on at the meeting at lunch. People don’t like the mayor and present council.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Archives